Young people want to talk about politics. Many teachers would rather they did it somewhere else.

The risks are real: a heated room, a complaint from a parent, an accusation of bias. So political education gets reduced to a worksheet. Students learn how a bill becomes law and never practise what democracy asks of them, which is to argue with people they disagree with and still share a room with them afterwards.

No one who leads a discussion is truly neutral. The position I teach is to be on the side of dialogue. You don’t argue a case, but you do protect the conditions that let everyone else argue theirs. This session shows staff how, using techniques from theatre and from rhetoric, which has been teaching people to argue for two thousand years.

Twilight to full dayFrom £350Cluster rates
Email to book →
Linocut illustration: four people each hold up a different jigsaw piece showing a landscape, a city, a maze and a face.
Four students, four jigsaw pieces. A class can argue for twenty minutes without noticing they are answering different questions.

Three Moments Staff Worry About

The session is built around the situations that make teachers steer away from politics altogether.

1

“Whose side are you on?”

How to answer a direct question about your own views without taking a side, and without sounding evasive.

2

The room that all agrees

When the whole class is on one side, the other side still needs a voice, and it shouldn’t have to be yours.

3

The comment that crosses a line

Telling heat, which is worth working with, from harm, which needs stopping, and knowing what to do about each.

What We Cover

Practical activities first, rationale second. The wider discussion principles are in Leading Difficult Discussions, and the two sessions work well as a pair.

  • Arguing in role – when students argue as characters, the drama gives them distance, and the teacher gets an impartiality safeguard built into the form.
  • Finding the sticking point – helping students see which ‘should’ is really in dispute, so they stop talking past each other.
  • Cracking the Claims – so that “that’s just your opinion” stops ending the conversation.
  • Rhetoric basics – ethos, pathos and logos as working tools for students, and as a way for teachers to describe an argument without judging it.
“Some positions are wrong. When someone denies another person’s humanity, you intervene directly – that’s not negotiable.”

What You Leave With

Takeaways

  • Classroom-ready activities for citizenship, drama, English and PSHE
  • A clear rationale for how each activity supports impartiality

Frameworks

Practical links to oracy framework readiness and the civic strand of enrichment.

Who it’s for

Citizenship, drama, English and PSHE departments; heads of sixth form; trust CPD leads.

Format and Fees

FormatOne schoolClusters
Twilight (60–90 min)from £350£500 per school for a series of three
Half dayfrom £500Group rates available
Full INSET dayfrom £850From £500 per school for two; £400 per school for three or more

Delivered in your school, anywhere in the UK. Travel charged at cost. Prices exclude VAT.

→
Primary INSET

Citizenship Through Play

Drama games for statutory primary citizenship, for teachers who have never taught it.

From £350
→
Any phase

Leading Difficult Discussions

Four practical principles for discussions that won’t start, won’t stop, or turn personal.

From £350
→
KS4 & KS5 Drama

Theatre for Democracy: Devising Workshop

Students choose a local issue and devise a short piece of political theatre about it.

From £400

Book a Session

Email me to book, or to talk about what would suit your department.

Email me